pkline83
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit pkline83's Xanga Site!

Name: Peter
Birthday: 8/14/1983
Gender: Male


Message: message me


Member Since: 1/14/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read
TheRevengeToTheTune
kapachino8
lifebeforelife
TheGreatCMajor
davidkline
Dnls04
sasquatchsmasher
ShesAnOxyMoron
treylow

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Blog!

peterkline.blogspot.com


Thursday, February 22, 2007

Currently Reading
Counseling Troubled Youth (Counseling and Pastoral Theology)
By Robert C. Dykstra
see related

Say what? i.e., what I did in seminary today.

    God is free, according to Barth, and yet His freedom is unlike anything we know as freedom. God’s freedom shows itself to us in a form we would call un-freedom. It shows itself to us in Jesus Christ. That God became man in Jesus Christ and as this man brought God’s revelation and salvation shows that God’s being is characterized by a freedom that allows both transcendence and immanence, indeed, immanent transcendence and transcendent immanence. God is free from His creation and free for His creation. The from, however, is never separated from the for, and, likewise, the for is never separated from the from. God is not sequentially but simultaneously transcendent and immanent. 
    God’s freedom as transcendence means that God is ontologically distinct from the world as the sole self-positing ‘I.’ God’s freedom as immanence means that God is personally present to the world in Jesus Christ as part of the world. God’s transcendence, however, grounds God’s immanence as the immanence of God. God is present to the world as part of the world as Lord over the world. Jesus is Lord. Yet God’s Lordship, His transcendence, is always the Lordship of Jesus--His immanence. God is Lord as Jesus. God is transcendent as immanent—and immanent as transcendent.
    God is free, and yet His freedom is unlike anything we know as freedom. God’s freedom as transcendence is focused by God’s freedom as immanence, and God’s freedom as immanence is funded by God’s freedom as transcendence. Jesus is Lord. The Lord is Jesus.



Thursday, February 08, 2007

otrblend

In order to maintain our standing as the world's best Over the Rhine fans, Megan and I had to buy a pound of their signature coffee beans. It is a nice blend, smooth, soothing, but with depth and passion, just like OTR's music.

As Karin and Linford say, "This is the coffee we wake up with every morning at Nowhere Farm -- specially blended for artists, writers, musicians, day dreamers, and night walkers!

This fresh-roasted, organic, fair trade coffee bean blend is inspired by our love of good music, good conversation, good laughter, good living, and best kept secrets -- all of which are meant to be shared."

Bottoms up!


Wednesday, February 07, 2007

Speak

One of my seminary classes has me reading young adult fiction. It is actually quite good. Here is a response paper I recently wrote:

Laurie Halse Anderson’s Speak is a compelling narrative about teenage Melinda Sordino’s journey to self-understanding and self-acceptance in the wake of her recent rape by a fellow high school student. Written in first-person, the novel is largely an exploration of the unseen emotions and inner-thoughts of a girl who is tortured by her inability to speak about her rape. The shape of the narrative corresponds to Melinda’s journey through her first year of high school as she juggles simultaneously her relationships with her peers, her teachers, and her family. Her relationship with her peers is shaped largely by their disdain for her for calling the police at the party at which she was raped. “‘My brother got arrested at that party. He got fired because of the arrest. I can’t believe you did that. Asshole.’” (p. 28) Melinda even loses her best friend for calling the police at the party. What her peers don’t realize is that she called the police precisely because she had been raped. Melinda’s relationship with her teachers is shaped largely by their perception that she has no interest in school and is simply an irresponsible student. “‘I knew you were trouble the first time I saw you,’” says a teacher who catches Melinda leaving the cafeteria after being humiliated by fellow students (p. 9). This perception is incorrect, however, as Melinda does take interest in school—Biology, for example—and performs poorly in school not because she is irresponsible but because she is suffering through a major life crisis—alone. Melinda’s relationship with her parents is shaped largely by their perception that she has given up on school, as well as the fact that her parents have major life stressors of their own that prevent them from giving Melinda the kind of attention and guidance she needs. “‘Cut the crap…Listen to me, young lady…You get those grades up or your name is mud. Hear me? Get them up!’” (p. 35-36) Once again, her parent’s perception is incomplete and inaccurate. Their threats only serve to worsen her depression. The common thread running through all Melinda’s relationships is her fear that no one really cares for her, that no one understands her, and most importantly, that no one listens to her. Speak narrates the many forms Melinda’s isolation takes, as well as how she copes with this isolation and gains the courage to speak.

How does Melinda gain the courage to speak? Ultimately, it is by being spoken to. Here, it seems to me, lies the central theme of the book: Silence begets silence, speech begets speech. Yet silence here is not simply the absence of words, but the absence of personal, truthful address. And speech here is not simply the presence of words, but the presence of personal, truthful address. Melinda is spoken at plenty of times, but only when she is spoken to is she able to return with truthful speech. Only when David speaks out against Mr. Neck and offers to help Melinda do the same—true speech—is she able to stand up to Mr. Neck. Only as Mr. Freeman treats Melinda as a person with creative potential—true speech—is she able to stick to a project and see it through despite failure. Only when Ivy comes after Melinda to apologize and help her clean her shirt—true speech—is Melinda able to take the first steps toward letting someone into her world. Melinda is gradually freed to speak the truth to the people in her life—first to Heather about prom decorations, then to Rachel about Andy, and finally to Andy himself. The book’s ending is perhaps a tad melodramatic, but I think it serves the purpose of the book well. Melinda begins her healing when she is able to stare IT in the face and speak the truth.

This book was a pleasure to read. It was interesting, funny, believable, but above all compelling. I found myself simultaneously aroused to anger and sympathy on behalf of Melinda as well touched by guilt that I have passed up so many opportunities to offer simple, truthful speech to hurting people. Anderson’s portrait of high school life seems to me to be profoundly accurate, maybe not in some of the details, but certainly in the general atmosphere she creates: loneliness, isolation, and deep hurt parading itself either as overzealous attempts to distinguish oneself or as apathy. Speak is able to portray both sides of this picture through the characters of Heather and Melinda, respectively. It is a book about depression, loneliness, and the profound impact human beings have on one another.


Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Currently Listening
Live 2003 (CD & DVD)
By Coldplay
see related

I had to write a sermon for a theology class, and since I don't actually get to give the sermon, I thought I would post it. This is the last thing I wrote in college. Kind of sad...

Romans 5:6-11

 

You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly. Very rarely will anyone die for a righteous person, though for a good person someone might possibly dare to die. But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.

 

Since we have been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God’s wrath through him! For if, while we were God’s enemies, we were reconciled to him through the death of his Son, how much more, having been reconciled shall we be saved through his life! Not only is this so, but we boast in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received reconciliation.

 

I.

 

In the horrendous days following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, our nation suffered a sustained period of deep confusion. With the sudden, unexpected deaths of thousands of civilian Americans at the hands of foreign terrorists, many of America’s deepest categories were shaken. No longer were we impenetrable, untouchable or safe. Terror was possible and actual in our very midst. One of the severest blows that 9/11 inflicted upon our American identity was the fact that the terrorists used our own instruments against us. They did not invade with an army, they did not send bombs from thousands of miles away. Rather, they quietly lived in our country for several years, made use of our educational systems, and at the right time, without much effort, redirected the course of a few of our airplanes and in doing so radically redirected the course of our country.

 

In the middle of such deep confusion, however, America managed to find a unified, coherent voice. There were no political debates or drawn out policy making processes to determine what this voice would be. It was simply self-evident to the American consciousness, manifest in the fact that we all began speaking this voice in one way or another long before it became the official rhetoric of our government. What was this voice? It had and still has multiple manifestations, but at bottom it is the voice of offended honor or dignity. Emerging from the unexpected horror of 9/11, the American rhetoric of response was not primarily about justice, human rights, world peace or even terrorism. It was about America and the wrong we had suffered. The American glory had been deeply offended, and through finding and punishing our enemies it had to be vindicated and restored.

 

Now before anyone gets worried, this sermon is not about the evils of the American response to 9/11. America had to respond, and we were right to do so. I simply want to draw our attention to an obvious manifestation of a deeply seated pattern of thinking in the American people that we as the American church are not immune from, and in fact suffer from. At the very heart of American identity lies the belief that we have a collective right or dignity or glory that, if offended, must be restored. The danger of this kind of political rhetoric is that it has the potential to very quickly divorce itself from the God-ordained controlling center of all governmental authority: the maintenance of peace and justice for all. Governments do not stand on the weight of their own dignity. They stand on the very concrete call of God to defend the dignity of others.

 

My goal this morning is two-fold. I want to identify a theological and pastoral concern that stems from this deeply seated American pattern of thinking, as well as turn our attention to a text which offers a rich resource for developing a Christian response to this problem and a way of thinking about God, reality, and our mission in this world.

 

II.

 

Our text for today identifies us, among other things, as God’s enemies. We are not currently God’s enemies, though at one point we were.  “…while we were God’s enemies…” How is this possible? How can creatures be enemies of their Creator? Earlier in his letter to the Romans, Paul makes it clear that we were God’s enemies because we willingly turned our backs on our Creator. He says that we knew God but did not honor him as God or give thanks to him for the life he has given us (Rom. 1:21-23). We made ourselves enemies of God by refusing to recognize ourselves as his creatures. The message of the Bible over and over is that the enmity that exists between God and world is the fault of those in the world. “…for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Rom. 3:23). God does not will us to be his enemies, he wills the exact opposite. It is us who have chosen to be enemies of God.

 

Yet the wonderful thing about our text for today is that it tells us that our enemy status with God is something that has been done away with. God has done something so that we are no longer his enemies. Before we get to what Paul says God has done to make this possible, however, I want to pause a moment and identify what I consider to be a harmful theological error that is easy to slip into when we think about this subject of God and his enemies.

 

As noted above, we as Americans are surrounded by a certain pattern of thinking when it comes to our enemies. Our enemies pose a threat to us in that they seek to undermine American superiority and stability. Americans feel genuinely threatened by their enemies and therefore our response, while cloaked in language of pride and glory, is really driven by fear. Our enemies reveal some kind of weakness in us, and therefore we must subdue them so that this weakness does not destroy us.

 

My worry this morning is that I suspect we often project this kind of response to one’s enemies onto God. Many of us, I am sure, have wrestled deeply with the thought that we are sinners before God, that we have made ourselves enemies of God, and that God is not pleased with us. There are usually two responses that human beings make to these troubling facts. Some people suppress this truth and turn even further away from God, thinking that God does not want anything to do with them as human beings, while other people anxiously work to mend their broken relationship with God, usually turning to spirituality or religion. Both responses, while different, come from the same distorted understanding of God. In both cases, God is thought to be out to vindicate himself by demanding something from his enemies. Those who think they can supply this something turn to religion, while those who know they cannot supply this something turn away from God altogether. They see no reason to turn to God if God will demand something they cannot or will not give. While there are probably those here who have experienced or are experiencing this latter response of turning away from God, I am confident that the majority of us struggle with the former response of anxiously trying to mend or maintain our relationship with God. We are religious people here, and this is the temptation for us. I know I find myself struggling with this frequently.

 

I am afraid that we too often let our response to our own enemies shape the way we think God deals with his enemies. We demand payment from our enemies, and so with think God demands payment from us. We pursue our enemies to punish them before giving sustained attention to how we will restore peace, and so we think that God is out mainly to punish us. We treat our enemies simply as a group of people to be subdued, and so we doubt that God loves us as individuals.

 

Our problem is that we have failed to let our understanding of God be shaped by what God has actually done. Sure we like to talk about the cross and resurrection as revealing the love of God, but we have a hard time thinking that these things truly reveal who God is. We suspect that God has some hidden agenda, that God is ultimately out for himself, just like we are.

 

The solution to our problem—and here is where out text for today comes in—is to return again and again to the only sure basis we have for knowing anything reliable about God—the gospel of Jesus Christ. God is known here and nowhere else. Here is the center, here is where we can truly know our Creator and cast off our fearful speculation about a fictitious God who arbitrarily demands what we cannot give. And what is it that we learn about God when focus our eyes and hearts on where he has concretely and definitively revealed himself? We learn that God deals with his enemies—all of us—in a completely astonishing, unprecedented way. God does not act like us, but acts as only he can, in sovereign, suffering love, not punishing or demanding payment from his enemies, but giving himself for them. Let us turn to our text and look at this wonderful truth in more detail.

 

“You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly. Very rarely will anyone die for a righteous person, though for a good person someone might possibly dare to die.” Here we have the foolishness of the Gospel. Christ dies for the ungodly, for God-haters, for God-despisers; he does not intervene on behalf of those who are somehow worthy, but for those who are powerless—powerless precisely because they are ungodly. Notice how Paul is emphasizing the extraordinary, unexpected nature of Christ’s action for us. It is a rare thing for another person to die for someone, even if that person is a good person. What it implied here is that it is downright absurd to die for an ungodly person. Why would anyone do that? Where is the honor in that?

 

“But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” The first part of this verse is perhaps one of the most precious phrases in all of Scripture. In the death of Christ there is manifested not the hatred or vengeance of God, but his love. This truth is immensely important as means that God does not begrudgingly forgive us our sins. God does not begin to love us only after Christ dies for us. Christ died for us precisely because God loves us; Christ’s death is the expression of divine love. And when we combine this with the previous verse, we begin to see what Paul calls elsewhere the width and length and height and depth of Christ’s love for us. God’s love is such that, in the person of Christ, he succumbs to the very death that we have brought upon ourselves by our ungodliness. God tastes death on behalf of the very ones who have turned their backs on him and scorned his glory. God does not punish and hate his enemies, he takes upon himself the death they deserve in order rescue them from it. This is our God, he is a God of overflowing, suffering love.

 

For Paul, this has radical implications for how we view God and our relation to him. We now have the freedom to hope in God, not hide from him. “Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God’s wrath through him! For if, while we were God’s enemies, we were reconciled to him through the death of his Son, how much more, having been reconciled, shall we be saved through his life!” Paul here is rejoicing in the triumph of God’s love over God’s wrath, and therefore in the firm hope that believers now have in God. To be sure, we must not overlook God’s wrath but must recognize that it is indeed real. God does not take sin lightly. It is a horrendous evil and an affront to all that God is. God does not overlook sin; He attacks it and kills it. This is the meaning of Christ’s death. We see in the death of Christ that the consequence of our sin is eternal death. Yet we must never think of God’s wrath as somehow a divine attribute, as if God is holy, loving, just, merciful and wrathful. No. God’s wrath is the form that God’s love takes in the face of sin, and once sin is overthrown, God’s wrath ceases as it has accomplished its purpose. Only his love remains constant and eternal. This is precisely Paul’s logic in this verse. Because we have been justified, i.e. because our sin has been overthrown and no longer has any power, we are no longer subject to God’s wrath. God’s wrath has been victorious in overthrowing sin and opening wide the gates of heaven. Likewise, the fact that we were reconciled to God in the midst of being God’s enemies proves that God is fundamentally a God of love, and that we have no reason to fear because he has reconciled us to himself. It was his own doing, and not ours. It happened apart from any effort of our own. Of course we shall be saved! See what kind of God we have! The God who reconciles his enemies to himself!

 

Yet Paul doesn’t stop there: “Not only is this so, but we also boast in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received reconciliation.” Why boasting? Because God’s love is so marvelous and over the top that we cannot help but flow over in praise and testimony. God has not merely righted the scales. He has not merely restored equilibrium. God has bestowed grace upon grace and brought an abundance of new life! God has reconciled his enemies to himself and made them his sons and daughters! He has taken the very creatures that despised their Creator and remade them in the image of his beloved Son. This calls for exuberant boasting in our God. Who else is like this? What other God can raise the dead and turn a wretch into a treasure? Only our God.

 

So how does God deal with his enemies? He reconciles us to himself. He loves us by taking our place as sinners and doing away with that place. God is not threatened by us, he does not have to repair his offended dignity or pride. He has a forceful reaction to sin, to be sure, but it is driven and propelled by his deep love for his creation. God has no hidden agenda apart from the reconciliation he has achieved for us in Christ. In Christ, we truly meet God in his fullness, the God who is for us; and because God is for us, no one can be against us.

 

III.

 

How might this message of the reconciling love of God affect our lives? First, let us return to the two different responses people often make to their broken relationship with God. To those who turn away from God because they fear that he does not want anything to do with them as human beings, we must speak the promise and hope of the Gospel. Yes, we were once God’s enemies, but this did not keep God away from us. God did not isolate himself in heaven and wait for us to repair the wrong we had done. God took the initiative in restoring the relationship we had broken, in fact, he loved us so much that he sent his only and eternal Son, his very being, to come to earth and bear the weight of our lost condition. Jesus Christ assumed our sinful flesh, stepped into our place as God’s enemies and bore this vocation to the very end, and in doing so did away with it. God himself did this! The Judge was judged in our place. Therefore, God’s first word to us is not one of demand but of provision. God deeply desires relationship with his creation, so much so that he took it upon himself to bear the ruin we had brought upon ourselves. We need not turn away from God because has never and will never turn away from us. We can turn to God in hope and trust because he has provided all that we need for an eternal life of freedom and joy.

 

To those who turn to spirituality and religion hoping that they can mend their broken relationship with God, we must speak (to ourselves!) the promise and hope of the Gospel. Just as tragic as turning away from God in hate or hopelessness is turning to God in anxious fear that we must do something to secure our identities as those whom God loves and accepts. We need to hear that “while we were God’s enemies, we were reconciled to him through the death of his Son.” Even before we came to know or confess the name of Christ, we were reconciled to God. Even before we knew ourselves to be sinners, God had turned to us in love. To work anxiously trying to establish ourselves through whatever means is to fail to recognize what has already been done on our behalf. We are too late to get in a word about who we are. We are God’s creatures whom he loves and whom he has reconciled through the death and resurrection of his Son. We simply must live in the freedom of this reality.

 

Pushing the horizon back to where we began, we must also say that the way God deals with his enemies through Christ places radical demands on how we deal with our enemies. As Christians, as those who boast in God through Jesus Christ for the reconciliation we have received, we know the whole world to be determined by the love of God. When we turn to either neighbor or enemy, we are turning to those for whom God’s reconciliation is also valid; we are turning to those whom God loves. Therefore what is most true about our enemies, political or personal, is that God is for them. Our actions, both political and personal, must reflect this truth. This does not mean that we turn a blind eye to injustice or hatred, it does mean, however, that any response to our enemies must be driven and propelled by the love that God (and therefore we) have for them, not by a sense of damaged dignity or self-worth. Yes, this means that there are no easy paths to take with our enemies. The road of reconciliation is long and arduous. But we walk it because our Lord and Savior has pioneered the way for us.

 

 



Next 5 >>